An Open-Source Site Database of Strong-Motion Stations in Japan: K-NET and KiK-net (v1.0.0). 2 shows the distribution of seismic stations recording the earthquakes used in this study. The events were recorded at more than 400 global seismic stations. The depth of earthquakes ranges from 2 to 624 km and event magnitudes are between M3.3 and M8.4. Kawase (2021). How Well Can We Predict Earthquake Site Response So Far? Machine Learning vs. The earthquakes occurred from 2010 to 2015 between 15S45S and 62W90W (Fig. Machine Learning in Seismic Hazard Assessmentġ) Zhu, C.*, F. 1) local formats in use at individual stations, networks or used by a particular seismic recorder (e.g., ESSTF, PDR-2, BDSN, GDSN) 2) formats used in standard analysis software (e.g. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 147 (ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002614 Discussion to “Epistemic Uncertainty in Site Response as Derived from One-Dimensional Ground Response Analyses by Jonathan P. Geophysics Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics Overview Section 2.6: Seismic Hazard and Risk Dynamics Overview Topics Projects Infrastructure Staff Publications Data, Products, Services The goal of the section is to achieve progress beyond the state-of-the-art, in all steps leading to an improved assessment of probabilistic seismic hazards. Within-Site Variability in Earthquake Site Response. Nakano (2021). How Well Can We Predict Earthquake Site Response So Far? Site-Specific Approaches. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 139, 106301. Evaluation of a Novel Application of Earthquake HVSR in Site-Specific Amplification Estimation. Site Response Prediction and Uncertainty /Variability Quantificationġ) Zhu, C.*, M. Liu (2021). HVSR-based site classification approach using general regression neural network (GRNN): case study for China strong motion stations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 109, 2710–2721. a spin-off from GFZ Potsdam (developer of the real-time earthquake processing and. Testing the Depths to 1.0 and 2.5 km/s Velocity Isosurfaces in a Velocity Model for Japan and Implications for Ground Motion Modelling. buoy, etc) Generation of bulletins based on predefined templates. Which is a better proxy, site period or depth to bedrock, in modelling linear site response in addition to the average shear-wave velocity? Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18, 797–820. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 110, 427–440 Ģ) Zhu, C.*, M. Detecting Site Resonant Frequency Using HVSR: Fourier versus Response Spectrum and the First versus the Highest Peak Frequency. Geophysical Journal International ġ) Zhu, C.*, F. Assessing two- and three-dimensional site response from single-station earthquake records. Interaction of geometry and mechanical property of trapezoidal sedimentary basins with incident SH waves, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14, 2977-3002. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 104, 296-306. Statistical analysis of the additional amplification in deep basins relative to the 1D approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 115, 402-412. Quantifying the edge-induced seismic aggravation in shallow basins relative to the 1D SH modeling. Data, Products, Services GFZ Publicationsġ) Zhu, C.*, F.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |